Your opinion of this one vs the other 50mm lenses

I love the 50mm range on my a100 and now a700, i often find myself using the 50 1.7 Minolta (Original) for portrait type stuff and have been dying to get a new 50mm toying between the sony 1.4 and the macro. I already have and love an older version of the Tamron 90mm macro for 'real macro' work. So the question is, in your opinion, which of the 3 50mm lenses is best for portrait work? and are they good enough to bother replacing the 50 1.7 or should i just keep saving for the eventual 85 CZ and 70-200G?

Love the site and thanx for the reviews! It surely is not helping the lens lust in my world.

~brian

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max eight images) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http://your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg

    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.