Hey Carl

Just wanted to say nice website...and review of the a200. I currently have a 5d and don't know whether the a350 will fill the bill or just splurge for the a700. I think the a200 will be a great camera...My only question is wth the LV implementation on the a350, is there anything that it DOESN'T do as well as the a200 because of this? FPS aside, that is... Most of what I do is play with landscapes and macro, however low light indoors may be in the future with a 17-50/2.8 Tamron lens. I'm sure the a700 would AF better with the extra sensor at the 2.8 level.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max 6) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http//your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg

    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.