Home » Reviews » Sony A200 Review

Thanks Carl for the reply...

On March 3rd, 2008 vois says:

I'm the one you answered the questions on and yes I will get the A700...My mind is made up.

Regarding the 17-50/2.8 Tamron, I already have the Tamron 18-250 DiII and the Tamron 70-300 Di that you just had in the review is on the way (steal I think for $160). Also have the 50/1.7 and both kit minolta lens (18-70 and 75-300). Given that and the a700, do you think (considering low light) and 2.8 (extra sensor on a700) that the 17-50 Tamron would be a better alternative to the 16-80 CZ(which can't use the additonal 2.8 sensor)? Would use it indoors flash and no flash and for landscapes. The 18-250 I think is already at f/5 by 50mm if memory serves me correctly.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max 6) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http//your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg
    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.