Home » Reviews » Sony A350 Review

Hey Carl

On April 2nd, 2008 GrahamB says:

I was hasty in posting. I processed the Raws in ACR 4.4, with my reported results. While I'm very happy with my A700's files with ACR, Adobe is no friend to the A350.

When processed in Sony Image Converter, it's as if I'm looking at files from a different camera. The noise was much better and the IQ had more "life" to it for lack of a better description. I initially discounted the A350 but may consider it to replace my 7D as a second body. Of course, I'm hoping the flagship will be in my budget ballpark and the A700 will become my second.

Not to start a rant, but it looks like Sony would have insured the A350's output would work better with ACR. Given their intention to capture market share, their files less than stellar performance with the de facto standard Raw converter is inexcusable.

Regards,
Graham

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max 6) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http//your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg
    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.