Home » Reviews » Sony A350 Review

Thank you Paul :). Basically

On April 8th, 2008 cgarrard says:

Thank you Paul :).

Basically if you want the most resolution and don't shoot high ISO the A350 is great from 100-400, and cannot be beat from 100-200 by any Sony to date. I am pretty solid on that conclusion at this time.

I haven't had enough time to compare the A350 to the A700 to see where the threshold lies with resolution vs. ISO, at what point the two meet up in resolution figures at any given ISO. Imatest results are needed for that or a lot of pixel peeping images.

Nothing wrong with waiting for the flagship if you have the bread if FF is that important to you, it should be a resolution beast. Currently the 21mp Canon EOS writes about 2800 lines per pic. width, thats nearing 35mm film resolution of 3K. I think the 24mp sensor just might reach that number with a good lens, or just fall short (im guessing about 2925 lines).

Carl

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max 6) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http//your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg
    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.