Great review Carl, did you find the range limiting?

A 36-105 effective focal length sounds okay but how practical is it for the price range? My Zeiss 16-80 is not built as well but it is very wide and yet long enough for all types of work with the ef at 24-120 coverage. Add a beercan and the spread is well covered. This one seems to me to be a three lens setup for wide and then long on the other end. For the dollar value I am wondering if many folks will go that route?

My guess is for the grip & grin photographer it will be an excellent choice because my experience was that a 35mm focal length was perfect for most smile and handshake work while portrait photographers may want to go for a prime lens like the 85mm Zeiss. This focal length just does not seem that attractive to me. What did your experience with it reveal, did you feel at all limited? Did you have enough spread in the zoom to work well without switching out to something longer?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max eight images) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http://your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg

    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.