Home » Does the lack of MLU on the A200, A300 and A350 have any real impact on picture quality

RE:Does the lack of MLU on the A200, A300 and A350 have any real

On May 16th, 2008 KonicaA3 says:

While I agree I would have preferred to have had the option of using MLU, the fact remains that it is not available in these cameras.
Bob Atkins advises the following:
"In general, for lenses of 300mm and over (and macro work), users should try to avoid using shutter speeds between 1/30 and 1/4 second for optimal sharpness. For "normal" work with lenses of 100mm or less, sharpness loss due to mirror induced vibrations does not seem to be an issue."
In addition the SSS should eliminate any remaining vibration, but I digress, this is why I would like to see real world results. It is also understood that a steady tripod and the 2 second self timer or remote release should still be used.

Thanks,

Keith

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • In forums, registered users can post images by merely pasting the image urls(max eight images) from wherever they are hosted.
    Example of url to paste: http://your-web-hosts-name.com/your-image-name.jpg
    If your images do not display some hosts such as PBase require you use special links or similar, to show images offsite.
    If posting from Flickr be sure to post the direct url including file extension(right click copy image location), not just the directory.
    Links with unusual special characters or that are extremely long, will likewise not display.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Sorry spammers make us have to do this. If you can't read it, there is a reload button to get a new one.