Sony 70-300G SSM 4.5-5.6 -Hands on First Impressions and Samples

Sony 70-300G SSM 4.5-5.6 Telephoto Zoom Lens
You can also go direct to the SAL70300G Sony 70-300G Full Review

70-300G SSM

At PMA 2008, I was fortunate enough to be able to strap this lens onto my A700 and fire off a couple of pictures. But before I go into my impressions I want to say that before PMA, my general thoughts on the 70-300 zoom range lenses were that there are a couple really good lenses in that range, and many that are mediocre.

One is very much dated (75-300 beercan) but venerable and probably one of the most popular Minolta lenses to date. Great value for the price. The other was the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro 1:2. For my 30 or so minutes with my A700, this lens performed magnificently, until the plastic gear inside was stripped by the higher torque motor of the A700. No fault of the camera though, as this is the only lens that has any trouble on my A700. Due to internal build quality it simply couldn't hold up.

Needless to say, I haven't used the 70-300 since, and I've wanted a "new" replacement. When I purchased the 55-200 Tamron, my heart strings were again pulled and I have long since forgotten my beloved Sigma. While I have silently vowed not to purchase a 70-300 class lens again, all that changed on that Thursday at PMA.

As soon as I took a look at this lens I realized that Sony was out to create another winner. Its build quality feels as good as this lens looks. I was shocked to hear the asking price of this lens of $799.00. From the ultra smooth zoom and focus ring action, to the silent motor focus, I was instantly hooked. The end of the lens body is topped off by a rather thick anodized aluminum ring, which gives is not only a clean and well engineered finish, but probably aids in overall durability as well. I particularly liked the focus hold button placement on the lens body, and the fact that it has an electric focus limiter to speed the hunting scenario up to boot. All this says this lens was out to be a serious product.

Another point worth mentioning is how this lens handles. It is not a light lens, nor is it an anvil either; weighing in at 1lb 12oz, or 800 grams. However, matched with the A700 they felt very well balanced together. I can foresee handheld birding shots all day with this lens. It just mates perfectly well with the A700, in feel, weight, and looks. I found myself embarrassed when I realized that while I was wielding left and right trying to simulate a fast action sequence and getting feel for the heft, the Sony Tech rep was just silently watching me. I just smiled and called myself a photo geek.

A specification that also adds to the allure of this lens is a very decent maximum magnification ratio of 1:4. This should be plenty for flower shots and even decent macro shots (with a bit of cropping). This lens is also incredibly bright, when I looked through the viewfinder I immediately noticed how well light transferred through it. Seems by first impression to live up to the G badge rather well. In the few shots I took with it, I could tell this lens should be capable of very good results. Luckily we will be able to review one as soon as it is available in mid to late March.

*Focusing notes: Due to low light and low shutter speed figures with the image samples, I didn't want to go into how fast this lens focused. However, I can say that it focuses very quiet and very smooth. When we have a review up, I will go into this into great detail. Sorry I don't have more for you but I didn't think it would be fair to report about it in detail at this time. Hope you understand.

For now, I will have to live with my short time at the counter with it and dream of having it in my kit.


Here are a couple of sample shots I took. Lighting was relatively dim at PMA and I had to ramp up the ISO to 1000 to get a decent shutter speed. They aren't much, but at least we have a couple. CA seems to be tamed well, and the images have a nice smooth overall look to them from my perspective.

Full resolution samples here:

Sample #1

Sample #2

For 56K users:

Image #1

70300 image

Image #2

70300 image2

And a shot showing the 70-300G fully extended (not taken with the 70-300G, rather the 18-250)

70300 sample3

 

70-300 weight

mmmm...800g = 1.7lbs; give or take...

Thank you for catching the typo!

1lb 12 oz oh boy.

Carl

Big beercan

The old big beercan is a 75-300, not a 70-300.

Again, thank you

A bit punchy on the typos! Appreciate the help.

Like to know who you are! :) Come aboard!

Carl

Plastic gear

Nice review Carl. No issues with the weight for me but that stripped gearing is a concern. I imagine Sony with address that in short order. I have pause with an older Sigma 70-300 apo for the same reason. I haven't heard too much on other forums, but I wonder how many of these have been torqued-out by the a700?

Gene

Gene

Thank you :)

I don't think Sony will address it as long as the A700 doesn't do it to their own brand, and so far, I've only heard of this lens from Sigma being stripped, Sony, KM, Tamron, all fine.

I think Sigma needs to not make those with a plastic gear or whatever internal part it is that is getting torqued out.

Carl

thanks for the review

Carl,

ok, I know due to the limited light at PMA you do not want to get into the issue of AF speed. Do you own a 70-210 f4? and if so how would you compare the 70-300G to it given the same conditions. This is the important issue for me since I am looking to upgrade from the beercan to a lens with better performance if possible and right now the new Sony 70-300G looks on paper to be the best new lens out there in this range.

Nope don't have a beer can

And it will be an interesting comparison if I get my hands on one for a review (beercan that is). I imagine the SSM will keep track better.

Carl

A forum request and of course a Thanks!

Carl & Eric,
I fully understand that when you post sample images for folks to review that you are trying to give as much as possible for them to look at. Since this is all new, the web site and the presentation concept, I have found the need to speak up for those of us stuck in the slow lane on the super highway called the WWW.

My 56k modem is the only choice I have available to access the web as such when images start getting larger and larger to show resolution and resolving power of a lens. . . etc I just have to skip over them because things simply take to long to download.

My suggestion is maybe posting a smaller image as a "thumbnail" image as the link button to the full blown image. This way folks in the slow lane can at least obtain some idea of what the discussion is referring to or the commentary is trying to demonstrate? This will also give us a chance to ascertain if we want to download the larger image for several minutes. Many times the download will start and stop before I receive the whole photograph. Not here, because I have been avoiding the larger images due to the download issue. . .

Just an idea as a suggestion from a forum member for you to consider, Thank You for listening.

Thats a great idea, how about

I post some 800x600s and keep them under 150k each?

Better than a thumbnail?

And we really appreciate the honest feedback. We can't always think of everything but we are sure trying. :)

Carl

Thanks Team! They loaded quick and clear!

Those are great for me and I hope the rest of our community in the slow lane.

I have been so interested in this lens that I've gone to my SonyStyle sight and added it to my wish list. Now if somebody can just do a real time comparison between it and my old big beer can?

Carl if you want to "borrow" my BBC when you get one of these in your hands and out in the real world I'll ship it over to you. The comparison is that important to me. You can contact me if that is of interest to you???

After all I can get another of the great lenses if the two come up close to each other in a trial!

Very interested and what an excellent offer.

Carl

Old 75-300 was not a beercan

As pointed out previously and not corrected.

Stripped gear??

For my 30 or so minutes with my A700, this lens performed magnificently, until the plastic gear inside was stripped by the higher torque motor of the A700.

Since it is an SSM lens which I presume means it has its own focus motor, how is the A700 motor likely to cause an issue.

Keith

I think the stripped gear

I think the stripped gear was the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, not the new sony lens.

Carl, I live nearby (Irvine)

Carl, I live nearby (Irvine) and have a beercan you can borrow for your comparison.
If you are interested, pm me.

Jim B

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.