Tamron SP Di II 60mm F/2 Macro Lens Review
Tamron SP Di II 60mm F/2 Macro Lens Review
February 2010, Carl Garrard
In Use Impressions (Tested on the Alpha 700 and Alpha 900 DSLRS)
It's been a while since my last lens review. I've been quite busy on multiple projects at a time, but alas the clouds had cleared enough for me to pick a new lens to review, and the Tamron 60mm f/2 Macro was my first choice. A big thanks to Tamron for providing this lens to us here at AMW for testing/review purposes. The specifications of this lens, including the price seemed a decent value to me, the only initial concern however was that the lens wasn't for use on full frame DSLRS. You might think differently about that though after reading this review.
Tamron SP Di II 60mm F/2 Macro Lens (Full Manufacturer Specifications)
- Model- G005
- Lens Construction (Groups/Elements)- 10/14
- Angle of View- 26° 35’ (APS-C size equivalent)
- Diaphragm Blade Number- 7
- Minimum Focus Distance- (Sensor to subject) 9.1in. (0.23m)
- Macro Magnification Ratio - 1:1
- Filter Diameter- 55mm
- Weight - 400g (14.1oz.) *
- Diameter x Length- 2.9 x 3.15in.(73 x 80mm)
- Accessories Included- Lens Hood
- Mount: Sony - Available, Canon - Available, Nikon - Available
Build Quality and Looks
- Equipped with a manual focus switch on the side of the lens only, the little Tamron is simple in appearance and refined (a newer look for Tamron lenses, but a welcome one). It looks "modern" and well engineered- quite snazzy in fact. I can see the owners of this lens proudly wielding it around and showing it off.
- The red lens lens attachment mark is large and easily distinguishable (more of a straight line than a dot), and a focusing scale is included under a window on top of the lens as well. A larger than usual gold band surrounds the Tamron which is made of metal (a nice accent) and gives the full name of the lens as well as the 55mm filter size information (it is not stated on the front element housing).
- Refined rubber knobs surround the large focus ring and aren't as deeply grooved as previous Tamron lens designs and are rounded out and smoother, which should help ward off dust and debris from lodging itself permanently (easier to keep clean in other words), and it adds to the newer modern minimalistic look of the lens.
- Built well with dense high quality composites but without being cheap whatsoever, the Tamron has a dense but lightweight heft to it. The lens hood is thicker than other makes which should make some other manufactures pout in shame. On the rear of the lens, it has a polished anodized aluminum lens mount.
Focusing Speed
- Tamron's 60mm f/2 macro lens is equipped with an internal micro motor and is a pretty quick focusing lens (and quiet), which could be the reason Tamron chose not to include a focus limiter switch in this model. Pity to some of us, because including such would have given even more versatility to the lens design. If a focus limiter were included cutting the full range of focus in half - this theoretically could make for even quicker acquisition of focus- great for street shooting, or action portraiture. Likewise, it does not have a focus limiter switch.
- To give you some idea of comparison- as long as the Tamron doesn't have to focus from infinity and back, it compares well to the focusing performance of the 50mm f/1.4 standard Sony lens in terms of speed of acquisition for follow up focusing or tracking. Quite a shock, for the good side. But because the Tamron will occasionally hunt through the range, the Sony is a better choice for speed freaks. The lens does not have a built in screw drive that makes it possible to override the internal focus motor.
Handling
- The focus ring is large and operates relatively smooth with about one millimeter of free play. Note that for very fine manual focusing, it seems a little stiff (twitchy would be the best word), but not any stiffer than the Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro- in fact a bit smoother. The internal clutch is pretty loose so unless you are looking at the distance scale screen it is a bit tricky to determine if you've reached min/max focus distance. It thankfully does not focus past infinity so night shooting/low light shooting (if needed) finding your infinity focus point will be a breeze.
- The lens hood is thick plastic, and rather large (almost the same size as the Tamron 70-300mm LD Macro's lens hood) and snaps into place just right. Since the Tamron is an internal zoom and focus design wherein the front element does not move into the lens housing (nor does it rotate), you may need the lens hood after all (most macro lenses have an element deep within the lens housing that itself acts as a lens hood). For all intents and purposes the Tamron 60mm f/2 macro operates and looks more like a 60mm standard lens than it does a macro lens, but it focuses quite close (slightly better than it's specification sheet)!
- Overall the Tamron is a pretty small lightweight lens and on both the A700 and A900 bodies felt that way as well. Balance is offset a bit to the rear on these bodies, but on a smaller and lighter body such as the A500, I found there to be a more even balance. Terms of length, it looks about twice as long as the standard 50mm f/1.4 Sony prime on the body without the hood, with it on it's neither long or short- falling in the middle in that category.
Full Frame Surprise?
- Since the Tamron 60mm f/2 isn't a Sony design, there isn't any hard wiring telling the A900 to automatically switch to APS-C crop mode (unlike some Sony lenses that do this and will not allow you to take the camera out of that mode-tsk!!!GRR!). This means you can use this lens on a full frame sensor without the body automatically switching to this mode.
- For full frame, I can see why Tamron calls for the 60mm f/2 macro to be an APS-C lens only, but technically you can use it on full frame as the image projection covers the entire sensor. There is 'severe' corner softness at f/2 through about f/4 and about 3 full stops of vignetting which starts in the corners and gradually tapers off towards f/5 slowly. However, the lens shapes up 'decent enough' on a full frame sensor by f/5.6. Since the rear optical image projection covers a full frame sensor, it also gives a distortion free (vignetting free) view through the A900's optical viewfinder.
- This was surprising to me, as I expected not only vignetting in the viewfinder but completely black corners in image testing- this however is not the case. So although Tamron doesn't say the 60mm f/2 is a full frame lens, I can see some buyers using it on full frame anyways, those of course not expecting stellar corner performance or can manage the vignetting.
- Center sharpness is excellent (about 65% of the middle of the frame through the entire f-stop range. Corner softness can come in handy for portraiture, and since this lens has a very shallow depth of field on a full frame lens at f/2, this may be an actual benefit to some. For those wanting tack sharp corners, be wary if you are going to use it for full frame use.
- Since Tamron designates this lens as APS-C only, i've only tested on our new AMW lens focus chart with the A700. In my opinion, this lens performed good enough to be considered plenty useful (but not optimized) for full frame duty, however I don't want to tell the world it is a full frame lens either.
- Would I use it on my full frame A900? Absolutley I would!
- However, I'd not be able to make any recommendations to anyone as every persons optical expectations differ in this regard. I thought however it was worth mentioning in this review and those who have both an APS-C body and FF body should at least try it out for themselves if planning to purchase this lens.



Another MACRO
Thanks for doing the testing of this beauty, Carl.
As a new lens on the block, this one needed to be ferreted out and exposed for the true value it has. I would consider it a first choice for the newer shooters, as a terrific alternative to a 50mm f/1.8, if you wanted MACRO capability and a low light image taker. f/2 gets you mighty close.
I would have liked that test performed, just to see if the focusing performs at least as well as the SONY 50mm f/1.8 DT in less that nominal lighting.
Most excellent.
Glad too Don
I pretty much agree with you there, the only thing you'd gain with the 50mm 1.8 is price, some AF speed, and like you say marginal larger aperture value.
Not sure which test you mean- af test in low light?
I'd like to have compared the two in that respect, just don't have the 50mm f/1.8 on me any longer.
Carl
Glad too too Don..........
Very nice review and enjoyed the take of full frame usage.
Seems like a very useable lens.
Thanks for the review Carl
I actually entered the macro contest that Tamron had to win this lens last summer. Since I bought my 700 and plan on a Full Frame as my next camera, I had kind of decided to pass on this lens because it was designed for only APS-C sensors. Since you posted these results, I will have to put it back on my "wish" list. Glad to know it can be used with FF. I agree with you about Tamron's value for the money. Not to mention the 6 year warranty. Good Job!
Wish you hadn't
Another great review Carl, but I almost wish you hadn't. I have just ordered the Tamron 90mm macro, now I have to re think my decision. I did initially consider the 60mm, but must admit I was swayed to the 90mm because of it's great "history" and slightly longer length. Oh well back to the drawing board. lol
Thanks again
Allan
Carl, Tamron 60/2.0 Macro and Sony 50/1.4
Thank you Carl, for this nice review. Please more littlebit about Tamron 60/2.0 and Sony 50/1.4! I have Sony and I am interested to have macro. I will stay with APS-C camera. Please inform about your opinion - is Sony better at f2.0 or not? The corners sharpness, ... is not so important.
A700, 50/1.4, 16-80, F42
aavoraigAMW
The Sony 50mm Macro doesn't do f/2, its max aperture is f/2.8.
Carl
Does the chart help?
Just curious...
C
Carl! Sorry, Tamron 60/2.0 and Sony 50/1.4
Sorry, because asking again: Tamron 60/2.0 versus Sony 50/1.4. Are these lenses same good when opened at f/2.0?
With the best, Aavo
Ahh ok
I think the Tamron has slightly better performance in this regard on APS-C, at least in terms of sheer resolution, CA performance. Contrast seem to be similar between both models.
Carl
Thanks, Carl
As my staff A700,50/1.4,106-80,F42 is pleasantly "limited" because I like to carry "little" bag on the coxa with all I have, it means, I can think about Sony 50/1.4 replacement with Tamron 60/2.0. If f/2.0 is good enough, this one step from 1.4 to 2.0, I think, I can left outside and replace it with macro. Thanks again - lot of help! With the best, Aavo
Focus ring?
Hey Carl,
Can you override the focus on this lens with it set in the AF position (e.g. full time manual focus)? I have read that the Nikon version of this lens can do that.
Also, does the focus ring rotate during focus?
Yes you can
override it with the af/mf button, and no the front ring does not move during focus :)
Carl
Full Time Manual
Well, I meant can you override it even if you don't use the AF/MF button? The Nikon versions appear to be able to do this according to Klaus' review. Even if you don't change the switch or use AF/MF button it will still let you turn the ring.
This lens has a micromotor, not a screw drive, so it's interesting that Tamron has somehow made a micromotor design that can do FTMF.
http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/481-tamron_60_20_nikon
Oh ok, I see what you mean now.
Yes manual focusing is possible with the manual focus ring- it is independent of any switch or setting in camera. And you can fine tune focus during AF as well. So no matter what, at all times, you can focus using the focus ring.
Carl
Protector for Tamron 60 f/2,0
What is better (protecting filter) for Tamron 60 f/2,0?
For example for CZ 16-80, the CZ T* MC Protector VF-62MPAM is better.
Aavo
So it is like "DMF" mode
So it is like "DMF" mode even if your camera doesn't have (or isn't currently set to) DMF mode? Neat! Looks like a good lens. Another bang-for-the-buck lens from Tamron, eh? (I've got 2 Tamrons, not this one of course, and like them a lot.)
Carl, Tamron 60 Macro versus Tamron 70-300 Macro
Carl, please comment these 2 macros, despite to 1:1 vs 1:2 and distance 23 cm vs 150 cm, for A700. With the best, Aavo
Thats tough
Recommending a lens for you isn't in my best interest, only because you know best what your needs are and I do not.
Both of these lenses are totally different in use.
For dedicated macro shooting, there is no doubt the clear winner is the 60mm Tamron. If you want more versatility than that, then the 70-300mm has very decent macro shooting for the price, with the added benefit of the zoom range.
However it is not a lens I'd endorse for low light shooting as the best results come from f8-f11 on that Tamron. The 60mm f/2 is a great low light lens, and is more discreet as well.
Too many things to compare here, but hopefully that helps you a little.
Carl
Thanks, Carl
You are great in understanding the questions arising from suspense. Yes, as I do not have telezoom lense still because the very good tele end of 16-80 and prints mainly A6...A5 and I do not have macro. I was looking for your Tamoron 70-300 review and just asked himself, why I do not think about enough good telezoom with macro? I tried both lenses today and the idea to replace 1.4/50 feels good. Now I find your "supporting" opinion. Thank you for this. With the best, Aavo
A700,1.4/50,16-80,F42.
Tamron SP 60mm & A700 - metadata
Hello,
I recently bought this lens, and whenever I mount it on my Alpha700, it doesn't seem to signal its data to the camera; every-time I import pictures in Aperture, they mention another 70-300 mm Tamron lens I own.
Anything I can do?
Thanks,
Chris
Really?
That's a strange occurrence.
I didn't have that issue. Try cleaning the contacts to see if that helps, probably won't but it can't hurt to try (just be careful to clean them correctly).
C